It appears that the Reagan-Bush gang felt they would live with Carter's agreement if they could control Panama. They almost certainly had a hand in , and Noriega was their kind of thug. They thought that he would be obedient as long as he got his cut. Noriega began acting increasingly like a disobedient dictator (such as failing to enthusiastically support America’s Contra proxy-war against Nicaragua), and the USA did not want him in power when the Canal went back to Panama. So America invaded Panama, installed its puppets, had them abolish Panama's army, and the USA turned Panama into an obedient client state again. Apparently, a primary reason that the USA acted so quickly in sending its troops to the Persian Gulf after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was that Bush feared Hussein would duplicate his Panamanian success by invading and quickly withdrawing, and leaving behind a puppet government.
As in Iraq, the USA used radioactive weapons on Yugoslavia. Depleted Uranium ("DU") is nuclear waste. When U-235 is refined from uranium, . It is not radioactive enough to make good reactor fuel or nuclear explosives, but works great as a penetrating missile, as DU is 1.6 times as dense as lead. DU is effective at penetrating tanks and other targets, but it is also radioactive for billions of years. DU is one suspected culprit in Gulf War Syndrome and escalating Iraqi birth defects, as many thousands of people have been exposed to the radioactive debris of those weapons. In one sense, they get creativity points. Why spend billions to when America can make bombs from it and drop it on nations that it destroys? Not long after the NATO bombings, America’s European allies expressed surprise and alarm that their soldiers who participated in the NATO bombings were exposed to DU debris. Why were they surprised?
persuasive essay on war in iraq - …
This essay was written during the USA's war against Iraq, which really began in 1990, and the essay was originally finished in the summer of 2002. It is partly a historical document of what it was like to live in those times, and was rather dated in ways in 2014, when I revised it. My , published in 2014, will be periodically updated, but this essay likely will not be revised much in the future. This essay was partially intended as an antidote to nationalism, and I believe that it gets the point across, and continuing to chart the decline of the American Empire holds little interest for me, as and only have so many hours in a day and years in a life.
Free sexual assault Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe
Project Censored's number-two story for 1991 was the heavy censorship that attended Gulf War reporting, as stories about Iraqi civilian casualties, fuel-air bombs, Highway of Death footage, and the like were all suppressed, and the USA's battlefield casualties were disguised as training accidents. The media served as the government’s propaganda organ, which contradicted any notion of a "free press" in the USA.
Free sexual assault papers, essays, and research papers.
The American media was with the warmongering. has been tracking the censorship in America’s "free press" since the 1980s. For 1991, their top censored story was CBS and NBC refusing to air footage from Iraq that was initially commissioned by NBC and shot by Emmy-award-winning producers. The footage showed civilian devastation of Iraq that contradicted the propaganda purveyed by the government and media, which gave the impression of the Gulf War being a "clean" one with minimal "collateral damage." Executive Producer Steven Friedman and anchor Tom Brokaw were enthusiastic about the film and wanted it aired. NBC President Michael Gartner killed the story. The producers then took the video to CBS. Executive Director Tom Bettag told one of the producers that he would appear with Dan Rather the next evening. That same evening, Bettag was fired, the story was killed, and the cheering continued.
Unpatriotic Conservatives - | National Review
While nobody connected with Iraq's situation disputed that a vast human tragedy happened, the numbers themselves are subject to a wide range of interpretation. Putting numbers on the dead is a macabre task, but it needs to be done, especially deaths that we were primarily responsible for. In early 2000, the Iraq Health Department released a report that stated that since 1990 about 1.3 million children and elderly had died because of the USA-led actions against Iraq. In 1998, UNICEF estimated 1.5 million deaths. Add about two hundred thousand soldier and civilian war deaths to that total, and the tally is between 1.5 and 1.7 million deaths, courtesy of the USA. Iraq's Minister of Health announced in January of 1999 that the Gulf War and sanctions caused nearly 1.9 million Iraqi deaths. Regarding Iraqi's children, in 1999, Richard Garfield of Columbia University conservatively estimated more than 100,000 excess children’s deaths, with a more likely estimate of about 227,000, and that is even highly conservative. Partly because the USA had a vested interest in not obtaining an accurate body count, as it did regarding our , and partly because nations at war have reasons to overstate or understate the body count (for instance, the USA recently admitted that it had greatly inflated the American body count regarding the Korean War of the 1950s), neither Iraq's nor America's governments could be wholly trusted on that matter.